Page checks from one place
Run saved page checks from the dashboard, API, CI or schedule.
Comparison guide
RenderLog combines no-code web tests, SEO checks and visual evidence
RenderLog is the main choice when SEO checks and no-code web tests need one page for expected results, baselines and repeatability.
Low entry price, broad coverage
0.002 EUR
per successful run
3.00 EURAdd capacity when needed
Page review history
Keep the accepted state, latest result and decision history attached to the page.
Lower entry cost
Start with usage pricing, then add capacity modules only when the workload grows.
On this page
Jump to the sections that matter for your use case.
RenderLog covers
No-code autotests and SEO checks
Use this category when the question is whether content, form state, metadata or several expected results pass without reviewing a full image.
RenderLog covers
- No-code scenarios with expected results for text, attributes, forms and UI state.
- SEO checks work as a prepared autotest recipe for title, description, canonical and H1.
- Autotest and visual results stay separated, but share the same page, labels and run history.
Compare with
- BugBug, Ghost Inspector and Reflect fit teams that need broader recorded browser test suites.
- Checkly fits engineering teams that want browser checks as monitoring code.
- Generic SEO crawlers are better for whole-site crawling, not one page or flow with expected results.
Choose RenderLog when the same saved scenario may need SEO rules, content checks and visual evidence in one run history.
Which path should you choose?
Choose by the job, not by the category. RenderLog fits when one team owns the page result, the accepted state and the next repeat check.
Start with RenderLog when
- Generated files must turn into a decision, not disappear into storage.
- Some checks start from API or CI and others start from the dashboard.
- You want the lowest entry price and optional scale modules.
A no-code autotest suite fits when
- You need expected-result checks for text, metadata and form states.
- SEO checks are part of the same run history as visual and content checks.
- You run checks regularly and want one page for results and history.
When a narrower tool can still fit
Use a narrower tool when the work truly ends at a file, data extraction or a custom browser automation stack. Use RenderLog when the page result has to stay visible, comparable and reviewable for the team.
Output files only
A narrow output pipeline can stay on an API-only tool when the team already has its own review process and history elsewhere.
Data extraction or crawling
RenderLog focuses on visual results and diffs, not scraping or content extraction.
Full automation fleet
Browser Run ships first. Containers and external render nodes are provider paths for heavier work and future capacity.
Where RenderLog wins
The practical difference is ownership: RenderLog keeps the result, baseline, review decision, history and price control together. Other tools can be better for pure rendering, scraping or CI regression.
What RenderLog already handles
- Manual runs, saved web tests, baselines, run history and automation are built in.
- Dashboard history and audit trail across runs.
- Automation, High Throughput and one-year retention can be added only when the workload needs them. Video stays a per-run uplift.
- Pay per use pricing with a small monthly minimum.
What teams often still build around an API-only tool
- Baselines and diff review are often missing.
- History and audit trails are limited.
- Scheduling and scenarios are basic or external.
- Teams end up building their own review workflow.
Frequently asked questions
Quick answers about choosing a visual review product or render API.
When should I use RenderLog instead of a screenshot API or visual testing tool?
Choose RenderLog when a captured page needs a baseline, a diff, a review decision and repeat checks. Choose a plain API or dedicated visual testing suite when the job stays inside that narrower workflow.
What counts as a run in RenderLog?
A run is one successful Check Case execution with a real result. Results can be screenshots, PDFs, HTML, Markdown, file output or video.
Do failed runs count?
No. Failed runs, bad runs and cached result hits are not billable when they do not produce a new result.
Can I capture a selector or full page?
Yes. Use the selector parameter for element shots or capture full pages by default.
Start with the page result that needs a decision
Create a workspace, choose a page or API result and keep the next useful change ready to review.